Sunday, 14 December 2008

The Threat to Globalisation

 The Threat to Globalisation

By Gopal K Agarwal,

Few years back, globalisation was the buzzword around the world. It assumed everywhere that with globalisation, economic development will come automatically. All countries were looking toward means of integrating their domestic economy to the world economy, basically US and European Economies.

How could India be left behind, we also that the world economies have to be integrated. We have to globalize. With the fall of communism, the path became more imретаtive. There was no alternative.

Although in hushed tone, we did talk of alternative ways, but it was not defined. The path was not clear; it was only conceptually delved upon. We were all confused. We formed the opinion that the lofty ideals of Swaraj and Swadeshi had more of a social relevance than economic foundations 

We are at a crossroads now. With failure of capitalism and current global financial crisis, we need to go in details the pitfalls of American Economic Model and how to engage our economy from the current global crisis.

The fundamental difference between US and other economies that the western economy works on consumerism, they are based on high consumption rate and successively increasing it to the tune of even financing it through debts. Currently US have a net debt of five trillion dollars. 

What US is doing is buying Produce from other countries by paying dollars, and this payment of dollars is being met through indiscriminate printing of currency. They have built a system of economic structure through mega institutions like World Bank, IMF, etc. Through this structure, the reserves of other countries are being kept in dollars and invested in US Treasury Bills. The currency, which was issued by US to buy produce from other countries, comes back to US as investments in its treasury bills.

Further, US successively resorting to deficit financing. It has huge budgetary deficit. Annual US budgetary deficit me from 162 billion dollars in 2007 to 455 billion dollars in 2008. On one hand, it's economists' adrese other countries to abstain from deficit financing, but it itself is nothing to deficit financing, we need to analyze the purpose behind. Then successively devalues its currency. Thi devaluation helps US to being down value of investments of other countries.

World is supplying produce to US in dollars and then investing its surplus in dollars. The money received by US being loaned to its population with nut proper credibility assessment, which is now being called Subprime lending, in lending without proper security assessment. Which was bound to fail and has failed. This indiscriminate lending itself was helping US to leverage its capital and create asset bubble, which has now buried, and the world has lost trillion and trillions of dollars in capital.

Further US has loose regulasury pro visions with regard to bankruptcy laws and leveraging h has accounting pro cedures and financial instrumens like Over the Counter (OTC) products, which helps it to camondlage the identity of lender and borrower, and helps in asod ing provisions and doclosures of mark to market losses, till the time it chooses to do so.

On the other hand, India is a savings economy. We save more than 35% of our GDP. We have huge domestic market and a very large population. Sixty-five percent of our population is young and working Non-payment of debt is a stigma our country and we have stringent anti-bankruptcy laws.

Fall of America is very certain. Dollar is very weak, but it is holding back only due to its being owned and bought by other countries.

We need to understand Americisuruation and its fall and to take correc ove measures, however difficult and hard they may be Because the konger we wait the situation will be further worsened.

Need of the hout in to desengage our economy from global economy Preserve out domestic market at all cost, take up massive infrastructure development projects, reduce merest rates, reducc indirect taxes, which form a very high consponent.

(The writer is National Convener, BJP Economic cell.)


Saturday, 20 September 2008

Economic Downhill

 Economic Downhill

By Gopal K Agarwal,

Monthly economic round-up

The month of August witnessed several important events having serious economic implications. The first was the economic outlook report of the Government of India for the year 2005-09. This report gives mixed indications on economic front the overall picture is not very healthy The highlight of the report estimates the economy to grow at 7.7 per cent in the next year as against nine per cent in 2007-08. The growth in the agricultural sector is to fall at two per cent as against 4.5 per cent last year. These are because of sharp inflation in global commodity prices and tightening in credit following sub-prime crisis in the US. These factors are leading to lowering of growth and causing pressure on our fiscal system through larger subsidy bills and supply constrained in physical and social infrastructure like electricity, water, road/rail transportation and agriculture. The investment rate is expected to remain the same, but savings are projected to decline. The capital inflows are also expected to fall to $70.9 billion from $108.03 billion last year. Inflation will remain the prime cause for concern in spite of all the efforts of the government. The government is also faced with an uphill task on the focal front, Its fiscal deficit target will overreach from growing off-budget liabilities, which are estimated to be at five per cent of GDP.

India's high credit growth is a cause of concern, according to IMF's latest Global Financial Stability report, and is one of the areas of potential concern. It said that swapping dollar debt for yen. which led to the forex derivative mess, although high, but manageable and not a cause for concern. In its report, it said that even after some efforts made by the central bank to rein in loan growth through a series of monetary and prudential measures, credit continues to grow at close to 25 per cent. In order to arrive at risks in the financial markets of the emerging market economies, IMF assessed fundamental conditions in those countries that are separate from those related to sovereign debt. One of the major indicators that are looked at is the growth in bank credit. Other indicators are the current account deficit as a percentage of GDP. the ratio of bank credit as a percentage of GDP and external position as percentage of GDP Though there is no potential threat on other parameters for India. Credit growth poses a potential threat.

Under this background, there was some relief to the exporters when rupee breached 44 marks. This is good news for exporters, but importers specially oil companies will have to face the pain of expensive dollars. According to a Nasscom study, this trend will help software company's earnings. The Indian software sector is expected to register 10- fold increase in revenues over the next seven years.

The government announced on August 15 a change in the provident fund investment policy, where the government has allowed private sector-managed provident funds and superanmat ing trusts to have greater exposure in stock markers. They can now directly invest up to 15 per cent of their investible funds in shares of companies on which derivatives are available in BSE and NSE. The other changes made in the investment patiers include merger of central government se curities, state government secun ties and units of gilt mutual funds into a single category and allow ing investment up to 55 per cent of the investible funds; providing a flexible ceiling for various category of instruments, instead of fixed investment ceiling as a present. This policy change will provide more liquidity to the equity market, but allowing private players to manage provident fund investments in capital market in dangerous.

(The writer is National Convener, BJP Economic Cell.)


Saturday, 23 August 2008

UPA Has no Charity

 UPA has no Charity

By Gopal K Agarwal,

Income tax amendment affecting donations to charitable organizations

Imposing tax on these charitable organisations by the Government is injustice to the people and is absolutely unfair. On one hand, Government gives subsidies to many commercial organisations and on the other hand, it is taxing these organisations, which run gaushalas and other charitable projects for the welfare of all.

Social service has been an important aspect of our life. Our scriptures have motivated people to devote their resources and energy for the welfare of our fellow men guiding us to a life of austerity. This path has led to establishment of many charitable and religious institutions in the country. It has been one of the main reasons for our social fabric to remain intact, in spite of being devoid of any regulatory mechanism for social security. Whether as the welfare of the destitute and incapable or the old people stray animals etc., these institutions depended on the donations from the influential and wealthy people since centuries. Now slowly and steadily, the government is putting cuts on these channels without establishing an alternative welfare mechanism.

A recent announcement in the Budget 2008-09 has amended section 115 BBC of Income Tax Act, incorporating taxation on all anonymous donations at a flat rate of 30 per cent. It will affect lakhs of charitable institutions across the country. It is unthoughtful and inhuman on the part of the Government that it has imposed 30 per cent tax on guptadan received by the charitable trusts. As a result of such a tax, a large number of small and big non-governmental organisations engaged in charitable activities for the underprivileged would be left with lest resources. These institutions will now have to pay 30 per cent tax on the entire quantum of their receipts compris ing anonymous donations.

Imposing tax on these charsta ble organisations by the Gover ment is injustice to the people and is absolutely unfast On one hand, Government gives subsidies to many commercial organisations and on the other hand, it is taxing these organisations, which run gaushalas and other charitable projects for the welfare of people.

Unlike foreign countries, India does not have any comprehensive policy on social security. In this situation, at least Government should not impose tax on these charitable organisanons, because all these institutions are for the support of the needy people. Guptadan in itself is a sonakar for the people. Our Shatrus preach donations for charitable causes without expecting any name or fame in return.

A petition has been filed before the  Petition Committee of Rajya Sabha, under the Chairmanship of Shri M. Venkaiah Naidu, against the imposition of this tax.. The petition was admitted on April 16. 2008. The petition is for considering grant of exemption from payment of income tax to certain categories of charitable organisations. The types of charitable organisations being recommended for Income tax exemption are orphanage, old age home, neat house and cow pen (Panjrapole and Gaushala) institutions which are related to handicapped people, hospitals for birds and cattle, institutions which provide free treatment for deadly diseases, inshunans dich pro Vide free shelter to oppressed people, institutions which serve meal free of cost, institutions which are meant for providing humanitarian assistance in case of natural calamity and disaster and institutions which are related to wadow and boyvoted women. The petitioner has prayed that since the aforesaid categories of charitable organizations take care of the safety, well being and survival of the oppressed and destitute persons, take care of the treatment of terminally ill patients, protect cattle and livestock including infirm animals, especially draught cattle and help translate the ideals of the Constitution, they should be exempted from payment of Income tax

The categones of charnable institutions mentioned in the petition, working for physically challenged bird and animal hospe tals, institutions treating comical disease like canoer free of cont providing fome relief to the victures of any calamity providing Ince meals and the organisations work ing for widows and destinite should not be saved rather they should be encouraged by the government.

We need to build public opinion in favour of this petition and request the committee to with hold the Government from imposing this tax.