Monday, 28 November 2011

Why FDI is not feasible at this point

 Why FDI is not feasible at this point

By Gopal Krishna Agarwal,

Inviting foreign direct investment is not the issue, but we need to look at the context of the entire move. FDI at this juncture does not fit the bill as India has a number of domestic issues to tackle. We need to look deeper to understand how and when the investments can really prove fruitful for agriculture and the manufacturing sector. The political and economic conditions of our country in the current scenario also need to be taken into consideration.

The government has launched a campaign to show us the merits of their move, but that's not enough be- cause it requires proof, which they are yet to produce. When they talk about quality assurance in terms of consumer satisfaction, they also need to project the cost-benefit analysis. For us, isolated product avail- ability is not sufficient. At the end of it, people want to know how many products really benefit them.

The government quotes examples of countries like China and Indonesia, wherein despite no caps on FDIs, the local retailers are flourishing But a reality check shows that China has become the hands of foreigners. The locals may be paid well, but their ownership has been bartered for the price they are paid. The owners have become em- ployees in the hands of foreigners. Do we want the same to happen to India?

Then, what about procurement? The government needs to give a clear picture of where are these firms going to procure the raw material from. Agricultural procurements in the US and Europe are procured at subsidies, and as for China, it procures subsidised raw material for its manufacturing. So that is one point where we need clarity.

There are many more such questions, which have raised doubts in the minds of all. How many companies does India open its market to If it is just the major ones such as Wal-Mart, Carrefour and Tes- co, then it is surely going to kill the market by shutting all doors to competition. And it would be significant to point out the Competition Commission of India is not as functional as it should be. That's the context being spoken about.

It is our domestic problems which provide a background to the opposition to foreign investments Reports say the net foreign exchange for India is negative. Thus, the government needs to explain how we can turn it around for our benefit and make it positive.

The Indian real estate boom, with its rampant corruption, is not hidden from anyone. So how does the government plan to solve the problem of exorbitant property prices, which scares the domestic investors away? As has been said earlier, India needs to look within and fix its problems first instead of looking out for foreign help.

Chinese owners have become employees nothing but a puppet in in the hands of foreigners. Do we want the same to happen to India?

Sunday, 27 November 2011

Why the BJP opposes FDI in retail

 Why the BJP opposes FDI in retail

Allowing 51 per cent foreign direct investment (FDI) in multibrand retail in India is not a good move, because the companies that we are inviting are known to monopolise the market wherever they go. There are several reports from across the world to prove that the five major companies, like Wal-Mart and Carrefour, use a monopolistic approach to kill local markets. Indonesia and the US are good examples of the result of such monopolistic policies.

India, with its weak manufacturing base and weak supply-side infra- structure, is not in a posi tion to compete with such global brands. But at the same time, our country provides such a big mar- ket that all big names want a piece of the pie. Thus, the onus of protecting our market and promoting the locals lies with us.

When we can build our domestic infrastructure so well (a case in point is the metro rail system), why do we need foreigners to come here? On the other hand, when the parliamentary committee had rejected FDI in retail, how could it have been passed leida 909 hisz Economics is a complex issue, which demands that a balance be struck between the positive and the negative. But, unfortunately, this bill gets weighed down by its shortcomings.

The move is nothing but a reflection of the govern- ment's stubborn nature. It also reflects how certain bodies are lobbying for their vested interests. Also, there is no denying that avenues of corruption are be- ing opened up in the name of development through this move.

Besides, when foreign organisations enter the mul tibrand retail market in India, they will look to pro- cure goods at subsidised rates here. Then, they will flood our markets with these goods, and look to pocket fat profits, further weakening our hold on our own market.

There is also the possibility that dealing with these foreign organisations may actually reduce our foreign exchange coffers, which may go in the negative.

It is important to look within and improve the na tion's lot by focussing on agriculture and the manufac- turing sector, rather than depending on others to come and help us out."

In conversation with Nidhi Qazi

There is no denying that avenues of corruption are being opened up in the name of development."

GOPAL KRISHAN AGARWAL Convener, Economic Cell, BJP