By Gopal Krishna Agarwal,
Communal politics, which ironically passes for
secularism in this country, has been the bane of Indian politics. It can be
traced back to the British policy of ‘divide and rule’, the result of which was
Partition. The Constitution was a repudiation of these ideas and the politics
that perpetuated them. It rejected the suggestions for a separate electorate
for the minorities and the proportional representation system, which it felt
would lead to a perpetually enervated nation. But in most policies that have
been followed until now, we have seen furtherance of vote-bank politics. The
narrative has to change.
The recent PIL filed by a Jammu-based advocate, Ankur
Sharma, in the Supreme Court, alleging that the rights of religious and
linguistic minorities in the State are being “siphoned off illegally and
arbitrarily” and the subsequent affidavits by the Central and Jammu and Kashmir
governments give us a chance to look again into the secularism versus
communalism debate.
No comments:
Post a Comment