Agri-reforms will empower farmers-The Opposition is wrong
By Gopal Krishna Agarwal,
The legislation will give options of new markets, attract private
investments to build infrastructure, help in better price discovery, enable
information dissemination mechanism, and provide future price assurance to the
farmers
The unprecedented 23.9% decline in
the gross domestic product (GDP) in the first quarter of 2020-21 is serious.
But gross value-added numbers show that agriculture grew by a respectable 3.4%,
suggesting the rural economy will drive recovery.
The Centre promulgated three
agriculture-related ordinances in June, which were a break from the past when
pernicious interventions by governments were justified in the name of farmers’
welfare. The supply chain in requires massive investment from warehousing, cold
storage, transportation to infrastructure in retail distribution. This mega
push can come from private sector alone. Agriculture has also been moving from
shortages to surplus and the policy on essential commodities from 1955 is bound
to be reworked and limitations removed for the benefits of scale of operation and
value addition.
These reforms were similar to the
1991 moment for the economy and were hailed by experts. The Committee of State
Ministers, in charge of Agriculture Marketing to Promote Reforms emphasised the
need to promote competition in the interest of the farmers and so had the of
the Standing Committee on Agriculture in its 62nd report. This had the support
of almost all parties.
With the government replacing the
ordinances by Acts of Parliament, the Congress, some other political parties,
farmer unions affiliated to them, and representing the interests of the
middlemen are raising a hue and cry. A misinformation campaign has been let
loose. The most sinister of them is that the government will do away with the
minimum support price (MSP), even though the Centre said that there is no
question of dismantling the MSP mechanism. The Agricultural Produce Marketing
Committee (APMC) and Mandi Act are in the domain of states, and, therefore,
there is no question of the Centre amending it unilaterally. Only interstate
commodity trade is in the Centre’s domain. The existing APMC infrastructure is
not being dismantled; MSP as an administration mechanism implemented through
the local mandis and procurements done by state governments, will continue as usual. The Narendra Modi government, on Monday itself,
announced the increase in MSP of many commodities.
Though the purpose of MSP was to provide an assured floor price
to the farmers, over time, it became the ceiling price. With the new Act on
facilitating trade and commerce of produce, the government is making it legally
and institutionally possible for farmers to explore the possibility of selling
at an even higher price, while retaining the safety net of MSP. With competition
from private markets, APMC markets will no longer enjoy the monopoly and the
farmer will benefit from better services.
As far as the argument of farmers losing their land to
corporates is concerned, The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on
Price Assurance and Farm Services Ordinance, 2020 Act, talks about an agreement
on the farm produce only, and not about the land. The Act has further
safeguards for farmers on land; in case of loss of produce, farmers alone will
get the benefit of insurance compensation and the infrastructure and equipment
used at the farm land has been protected as belonging to the land owners. Even
the dispute resolution within the Act has been delegated at the district level,
with the formation of district boards, and farmers will not have to run from
one court to the other to get justice.
Though the purpose of MSP was to provide an assured floor price
to the farmers, over time, it became the ceiling price. With the new Act on
facilitating trade and commerce of produce, the government is making it legally
and institutionally possible for farmers to explore the possibility of selling
at an even higher price, while retaining the safety net of MSP. With
competition from private markets, APMC markets will no longer enjoy the monopoly
and the farmer will benefit from better services.
As far as the argument of farmers losing their land to
corporates is concerned, The Farmers (Empowerment and Protection) Agreement on
Price Assurance and Farm Services Ordinance, 2020 Act, talks about an agreement
on the farm produce only, and not about the land. The Act has further
safeguards for farmers on land; in case of loss of produce, farmers alone will
get the benefit of insurance compensation and the infrastructure and equipment
used at the farm land has been protected as belonging to the land owners. Even
the dispute resolution within the Act has been delegated at the district level,
with the formation of district boards, and farmers will not have to run from
one court to the other to get justice.
The
lack of a responsible Opposition has been the bane of Indian politics since
2014. Anything that the Modi Government does must be opposed by the Congress.
The Congress, in its recent election manifestos, had asked for dismantling
APMC, but we have abstained from doing so.
The
legislation will give options of new markets, attract private investments to
build infrastructure, help in better price discovery, enabling information
dissemination mechanism, and provide price assurance to the farmers. With the
prime minister himself at the forefront and the Bharatiya Janata Party
amplifying his messages, there should be no doubt about the future of farmers'
welfare.
These
reforms were similar to the 1991 moment for the wider economy and were hailed
as such by leading experts
Gopal Krishna Agarwal is
national spokesperson of the BJP on economic affairs
No comments:
Post a Comment